All In One AI Hub – स्मार्ट AI Tools, Tech News & Online Earning

Tag: Supreme Court

CBI action after the strictness of Supreme Court, FIR on many builders in cheating from home buyers

Taking major action on the direction of the Supreme Court, the CBI has registered 6 regular cases against several builders and officials of unknown financial institutions in Kolkata, Bangalore and Mumbai. Along with this, the CBI has raided 12 locations in these three cities.

This action has been taken after the complaints of thousands of houses buyers who were misled with the connivance of builders and financial institutions. Many victims had reached the Supreme Court directly and there was a case of tricks of home loans called 'Subvention Scheme'.

Supreme Court ordered CBI

In April 2025, the Supreme Court directed the CBI to register 7 preliminary enquiries. Out of these, 6 tests were related to the builders of the NCR area, on which 22 cases have already been registered and the investigation is going on. The seventh investigation was on the builders outside the NCR. After the report of this investigation was submitted to the Supreme Court, the court ordered the CBI to register 6 regular cases.

Among the companies registered on M/s ITHACA Estate Private Limited (Bangalore), M/S LGCL Urban Homes (India) LLP (Bangalore), M/S Ozone Urbana Infra Developers Pvt. LTD (Bangalore), M/S Shashwati Realty Pvt. LTD (in Mumbai-Project Bangalore), M/S MKHS Housing LLP (Kolkata) and M/S Accme Realities Pvt. LTD (Mumbai) includes.

CBI found necessary evidence in search

During the search, CBI has found many important documents and digital evidence. The investigating agency says that the raid is still going on. This step is being considered a major legal initiative against the builders who cheated home buyers across the country and financial institutions in collusion with them.

Also read:- Bihar Election: Amit Shah lashed out at Rahul-Lalu, said in Araria- 'Live NDA, drive the intruders away'

]

Source link

September 27, 2025
Tirupati Laddu controversy: Question on the role of external officer in SIT, Supreme Court stays high court order

On Friday (September 26, 2025), the Supreme Court stayed the order in which an officer outside the Special Investigation Team (SIT) constituted by the Supreme Court (SIT) on behalf of the Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) was described as a violation of the court orders to allow an officer out of the special investigation team (SIT) to investigate adulteration in ghee used in the famous Tirumala Tirupati temple's 'Laddu Prasadam' (religious offerings) of the famous Tirumala Tirupati temple.

The Andhra Pradesh High Court had said that while investigating the 'adulterated ghee' used to prepare Prasadam, the CBI director violated the Supreme Court's instructions. Chief Justice B.K. R. Gawai and Justice K. The bench of Vinod Chandran said that the investigating agency is monitoring this investigation himself. In such a situation, if a particular officer is asked to cooperate in the investigation, then there is nothing wrong in it.

The defendant protested against the argument of Solicitor General

The bench asked, 'If SIT wants to appoint a particular officer, then what is wrong with this?' Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the CBI, said that the CBI director personally held a meeting with SIT members, reviewed the matter and allowed J Venkat Rao to remain the investigating officer in a limited role.

Mehta said, “He is just a record.” The defendant's lawyer protested against this argument of the Solicitor General, saying, “Investigating officers are not just a record.” The defendant originally moved the High Court.

Violation of Supreme Court to allow other officers

His lawyer said that the structure of the SIT was clearly specified in the Supreme Court order and should be a senior officer of the CBI Director, two officers nominated by Andhra Pradesh Police and a senior officer of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI). He argued that allowing any other officer to participate in it is a violation of the Supreme Court order.

The Chief Justice asked, 'Has the SIT finished the investigation monitoring? She is appointing only an investigating officer, who is working under her control. Stationing the order of the High Court, the bench asked the defendant to file a reply on the petition of the CBI Director.

Dispute started with an order of High Court

The dispute has arisen by an order of the High Court, stating that the CBI Director. By allowing an officer named Venkat Rao to investigate the case, he has worked contrary to the directions of the Supreme Court, as Rao is not formally part of the Special Investigation Team (SIT).

Also read:- Custodial Death Case: Supreme Court strict stance, CBI and MP government on delay in arrest

]

Source link

September 26, 2025
Custodial Death Case: Supreme Court strict stance, CBI and MP government on delay in arrest

The Supreme Court has adopted a strict attitude due to non -arrest of two police officers accused in the death of a youth in custody. The investigation of this case of Madhya Pradesh was handed over to the CBI in May by the court. Now the court has given the CBI and the Madhya Pradesh government time till October 7 for the arrest of both. The court has said that after this, the directors of DGP and CBI of the state can be summoned personally.

The case of murder of a young man named Deva Pardhi is of Myana police station in Guna district of Madhya Pradesh. On July 14 last year, Deva was detained on charges of theft. Along with him, his uncle Gangaram was also detained by the police. It is alleged that 24 -year -old Deva succumbed due to beating in custody.

Supreme Court ordered arrest

The FIR was lodged after the initial confirmation of the allegations in the magistrate investigation, but the action was carried forward in a loose manner. The names of the policemen involved in the case in the FIR were also not fully written. Police in-charge Inspector Sanjit Mavai and Umri Outpost in-charge Sub-Inspector Uttam Singh Kushwaha were neither suspended, nor arrested.

Deva's mother Ansura Bai approached the Supreme Court. On 29 April, the Supreme Court ordered the arrest of both the officers. On May 15, the case was handed over to CBI. The CBI arrested some people including Inspector Jubera Khan, Sub-Inspector Devraj Singh Parihar, accused of involvement in the incident, but Mavai and Kushwaha are still absconding.

Police officers running absconding now suspended

Ansura Bai has filed a contempt petition alleging that the order of the Supreme Court is not following. In the hearing held on Thursday (September 25, 2025), it was revealed that the two police officers who have been absconding for several months have now been suspended. Angered by this, the court directed to put the case again for the next day.

Next hearing in court on this date

In the hearing held on Friday (September 26, 2025), the CBI said that it has declared a reward of 2-2 lakhs on the arrest of Mavai and Kushwaha. The court expressed dissatisfaction with the CBI and the Madhya Pradesh government and gave them time till October 7.

The matter will be further heard on 8 October. The court has asked the investigating officers of the case to appear personally that day. Also, the protection of Gangaram, a witness in the case of judicial custody, has also been ordered.

Also read:- Bengaluru: Woman beaten and beaten on the allegation of saree, the video went viral and the police arrested

]

Source link

September 26, 2025
Supreme Court rejected the demand for a ban on 'The Satanic Verses', there was a dispute around the world on the book published in 1988

The Supreme Court has rejected the demand for re -banning the novel 'The Satanic Verses'. The petitioner said that due to the order of the Delhi High Court that came last year, this book has become available in India. This is a matter of hurting religious sentiments. But the judges did not consider the petition to be considered.

In 1988, there was a lot of controversy on this book by British writer Salman Rushdie. Islamic leaders from all over the world, including Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei, protested, describing this book as criticism of the Quran. The things written in this book were termed as blasphemy. After this, the then Rajiv Gandhi government had banned its imports, fearing the law and order deteriorating in India from this book.

In 2019, the petitioner knocked on the Delhi High Court door

In 2019, a petitioner named Sandipan Khan approached the Delhi High Court. He said that the ban on the book prevents them from importing books from international publishers or online vendors. This is a violation of their rights. The High Court sought information about the notification under which the book was banned.

During the High Court hearing, the Central Board of Customs (CBIC) or any other concerned agency could not present a copy of the alleged notification issued under the Customs Act, 1962. Finally in November 2024, the High Court said, 'No one could present the notification of October 5, 1988 at the hearing which lasted 5 years. In such a situation, there is no option but to believe that no notification exists. We cannot investigate its validity. Therefore, considering the petition as ineffective, they are closing.

Petition filed in Supreme Court against High Court order

In its order, the High Court allowed the petitioner to import 'The Satanic Verses' to India. After this order, the book became easily available in India. Against this, a petitioner named Mohammad Arshad Mohammad Jamal Khan filed a petition in the Supreme Court.

On Friday (September 26, 2025), the case came in the bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta. The judges found that the petition has been filed as a new PIL. But through this, the order of the High Court in a case is being challenged. After this, the Supreme Court refused to consider this petition filed through lawyer Chand Qureshi.

Also read: Millions of dollars were cheated in America, Indian -origin doctor got heavy, got 14 years imprisonment

]

Source link

September 26, 2025
'Census under the guise of caste survey in Karnataka', on the arguments of the Center, the High Court said- still we do not feel right …

The Karnataka High Court on Thursday (September 25, 2025) refused to stay the prevailing social and educational survey being held in the state in the name of caste-based survey. The central government had argued in the Karnataka High Court that this is a census being done under the guise of the survey and it is interfered with its jurisdiction.

The bench of Karnataka High Court Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice CM Joshi, while hearing several petitions questioning the validity of the survey, gave an interim order not to stop. However, the court directed the State Backward Classes Commission to maintain the confidentiality of the data collected and ensure voluntary participation.

The Karnataka High Court said in its order, 'We do not find it right to stop the survey released. However, the data collected in the survey should be kept confidential. He should not be disclosed to any person. The Backward Classes Commission will have to ensure that the information is completely safe and kept confidential.

The court has asked the Backward Classes Commission to issue a notification, which has been clarified that participation is voluntary. The court said that the calculations will have to inform the citizens in the beginning that they are not obliged to give information.

The order states, “If a person refuses to participate, the calculator will not try to convince him or pressurize him.” The petitions argued that this process is primarily a census and a violation of privacy. Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty, who appeared on behalf of the state, assured the court that there is adequate security measures and he offered to submit an affidavit on the matter.

On behalf of the state government, Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi appeared and Senior Advocate Ravi Verma Kumar advocated for the Backward Classes Commission. The court allowed all the parties to present additional written arguments in the coming weeks. The court has fixed December 2 for the next hearing on the matter.

The petitioners include KN Subba Reddy, members of the State Vokkaliga Union, Vokkaliga community such as former Chairman of Bangalore Advocates Association, members of the Lingayat community and Akhil Karnataka Brahmin Mahasabha.

]

Source link

September 26, 2025
'After the statement of witnesses, the case is wrong, the hearing of sensitive cases should be done everyday': Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has said that in particularly sensitive cases, the practice of day-to-day hearing has been completely abolished and the courts should adopt it again. The court, considering the right to hearing quick hearing, as being inherent in Article 21 of the Constitution, said that all the High Courts should set up a committee to seriously discuss this issue for the benefit of the concerned district court.

Justice J. B. Pardiwala and Justice K. The bench of V. Vishwanathan said that it is necessary to understand the current social, political and administrative scenario, including the police methods, to return to the old practice of hearing on day-to-day basis.

Thirty years old practice completely ended

The bench said in its order of 22 September, 'Nearly thirty years old practice of day-to-day hearing in especially important or sensitive matters has been completely abolished. We believe that the time has come that the court should adopt this practice again.

This order of the Supreme Court has come on the petition of the CBI, in which in September last year, the order of granting bail to an accused was challenged by the Calcutta High Court in a rape case. The bench said that one of the major factors responsible for the delay in justice system is not to continuously hear criminal cases.

Hearing continues day by day after witnesses statement

The bench said that even in such cases, the court consider the evidence 'in pieces' using the discretion and the cases continue to last for several months or years. The bench said that the legal status is that once the statement of the witnesses, the court concerned should continue hearing day by day until all the witnesses have the statements, except the witnesses who have left the government lawyer.

The bench said that the Chief Justice of the High Court can instruct his administrative party to issue a circular to the concerned district judiciary, in which it is also mentioned that every investigation or hearing should be done quickly. The bench said that the hearing of the case should be completed by 31 December.

Also read:- Patra Chala Money Laundering case: PMLA court action, summons issued on second supplementary charge sheet of ED

]

Source link

September 25, 2025