All In One AI Hub – स्मार्ट AI Tools, Tech News & Online Earning

Tag: CBI

  • CBI action after the strictness of Supreme Court, FIR on many builders in cheating from home buyers

    CBI action after the strictness of Supreme Court, FIR on many builders in cheating from home buyers


    Taking major action on the direction of the Supreme Court, the CBI has registered 6 regular cases against several builders and officials of unknown financial institutions in Kolkata, Bangalore and Mumbai. Along with this, the CBI has raided 12 locations in these three cities.

    This action has been taken after the complaints of thousands of houses buyers who were misled with the connivance of builders and financial institutions. Many victims had reached the Supreme Court directly and there was a case of tricks of home loans called 'Subvention Scheme'.

    Supreme Court ordered CBI

    In April 2025, the Supreme Court directed the CBI to register 7 preliminary enquiries. Out of these, 6 tests were related to the builders of the NCR area, on which 22 cases have already been registered and the investigation is going on. The seventh investigation was on the builders outside the NCR. After the report of this investigation was submitted to the Supreme Court, the court ordered the CBI to register 6 regular cases.

    Among the companies registered on M/s ITHACA Estate Private Limited (Bangalore), M/S LGCL Urban Homes (India) LLP (Bangalore), M/S Ozone Urbana Infra Developers Pvt. LTD (Bangalore), M/S Shashwati Realty Pvt. LTD (in Mumbai-Project Bangalore), M/S MKHS Housing LLP (Kolkata) and M/S Accme Realities Pvt. LTD (Mumbai) includes.

    CBI found necessary evidence in search

    During the search, CBI has found many important documents and digital evidence. The investigating agency says that the raid is still going on. This step is being considered a major legal initiative against the builders who cheated home buyers across the country and financial institutions in collusion with them.

    Also read:- Bihar Election: Amit Shah lashed out at Rahul-Lalu, said in Araria- 'Live NDA, drive the intruders away'

    ]

    Source link

  • Tirupati Laddu controversy: Question on the role of external officer in SIT, Supreme Court stays high court order

    Tirupati Laddu controversy: Question on the role of external officer in SIT, Supreme Court stays high court order


    On Friday (September 26, 2025), the Supreme Court stayed the order in which an officer outside the Special Investigation Team (SIT) constituted by the Supreme Court (SIT) on behalf of the Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) was described as a violation of the court orders to allow an officer out of the special investigation team (SIT) to investigate adulteration in ghee used in the famous Tirumala Tirupati temple's 'Laddu Prasadam' (religious offerings) of the famous Tirumala Tirupati temple.

    The Andhra Pradesh High Court had said that while investigating the 'adulterated ghee' used to prepare Prasadam, the CBI director violated the Supreme Court's instructions. Chief Justice B.K. R. Gawai and Justice K. The bench of Vinod Chandran said that the investigating agency is monitoring this investigation himself. In such a situation, if a particular officer is asked to cooperate in the investigation, then there is nothing wrong in it.

    The defendant protested against the argument of Solicitor General

    The bench asked, 'If SIT wants to appoint a particular officer, then what is wrong with this?' Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the CBI, said that the CBI director personally held a meeting with SIT members, reviewed the matter and allowed J Venkat Rao to remain the investigating officer in a limited role.

    Mehta said, “He is just a record.” The defendant's lawyer protested against this argument of the Solicitor General, saying, “Investigating officers are not just a record.” The defendant originally moved the High Court.

    Violation of Supreme Court to allow other officers

    His lawyer said that the structure of the SIT was clearly specified in the Supreme Court order and should be a senior officer of the CBI Director, two officers nominated by Andhra Pradesh Police and a senior officer of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI). He argued that allowing any other officer to participate in it is a violation of the Supreme Court order.

    The Chief Justice asked, 'Has the SIT finished the investigation monitoring? She is appointing only an investigating officer, who is working under her control. Stationing the order of the High Court, the bench asked the defendant to file a reply on the petition of the CBI Director.

    Dispute started with an order of High Court

    The dispute has arisen by an order of the High Court, stating that the CBI Director. By allowing an officer named Venkat Rao to investigate the case, he has worked contrary to the directions of the Supreme Court, as Rao is not formally part of the Special Investigation Team (SIT).

    Also read:- Custodial Death Case: Supreme Court strict stance, CBI and MP government on delay in arrest

    ]

    Source link

  • Custodial Death Case: Supreme Court strict stance, CBI and MP government on delay in arrest

    Custodial Death Case: Supreme Court strict stance, CBI and MP government on delay in arrest


    The Supreme Court has adopted a strict attitude due to non -arrest of two police officers accused in the death of a youth in custody. The investigation of this case of Madhya Pradesh was handed over to the CBI in May by the court. Now the court has given the CBI and the Madhya Pradesh government time till October 7 for the arrest of both. The court has said that after this, the directors of DGP and CBI of the state can be summoned personally.

    The case of murder of a young man named Deva Pardhi is of Myana police station in Guna district of Madhya Pradesh. On July 14 last year, Deva was detained on charges of theft. Along with him, his uncle Gangaram was also detained by the police. It is alleged that 24 -year -old Deva succumbed due to beating in custody.

    Supreme Court ordered arrest

    The FIR was lodged after the initial confirmation of the allegations in the magistrate investigation, but the action was carried forward in a loose manner. The names of the policemen involved in the case in the FIR were also not fully written. Police in-charge Inspector Sanjit Mavai and Umri Outpost in-charge Sub-Inspector Uttam Singh Kushwaha were neither suspended, nor arrested.

    Deva's mother Ansura Bai approached the Supreme Court. On 29 April, the Supreme Court ordered the arrest of both the officers. On May 15, the case was handed over to CBI. The CBI arrested some people including Inspector Jubera Khan, Sub-Inspector Devraj Singh Parihar, accused of involvement in the incident, but Mavai and Kushwaha are still absconding.

    Police officers running absconding now suspended

    Ansura Bai has filed a contempt petition alleging that the order of the Supreme Court is not following. In the hearing held on Thursday (September 25, 2025), it was revealed that the two police officers who have been absconding for several months have now been suspended. Angered by this, the court directed to put the case again for the next day.

    Next hearing in court on this date

    In the hearing held on Friday (September 26, 2025), the CBI said that it has declared a reward of 2-2 lakhs on the arrest of Mavai and Kushwaha. The court expressed dissatisfaction with the CBI and the Madhya Pradesh government and gave them time till October 7.

    The matter will be further heard on 8 October. The court has asked the investigating officers of the case to appear personally that day. Also, the protection of Gangaram, a witness in the case of judicial custody, has also been ordered.

    Also read:- Bengaluru: Woman beaten and beaten on the allegation of saree, the video went viral and the police arrested

    ]

    Source link